Sunday, October 24, 2010

1M Malaysians Reject 100-storey Mega Tower

As per today, we have officially reached more than 130,00o people supporting the page.

I am no politics supporter but I think I have to agree with this one. RM5 billion for a 100-storey Mega Tower is a big no-no. We have PETRONAS Twin Tower and I don't think we need another skyscraper in the country.

There's a lot more that we can do with RM5 billion than building another "bangunan pencakar langit". There's a lot more that we can generate than funding another Mega Tower building.

Yes, we do need development but I think now is the right time to develop other aspect other than developing a new building. I think we have enough of "tarikan pelancong". KLCC Twin Tower is one, Pavillion is another and I don't think building this so call "Bangunan Warisan" will do any justice.

Apa kata sogok sikit duit kasi buku teks kat sekolah-sekolah semua free. Lets make our universities a world recognized! Lets equip our hospital (I mean the public ones) with better supplies. Lets improve our public transportation for its' convenience. Lets generate more $$$ into tourism. Lets promote our country for its' beauty. Lets clean our super-dirty-city. Lets educate our people for their manners. Lets improve the living standard of our people. Lets help the needs. Lets improve the numbers on crimes. Lets!

I may not be the kind of supporter who chances their facebook profile picture into one of these.


  1. Because I don't think by changing the profile picture will help in doing anything.
  2. Because I still think that my current profile picture is way cooler that this.
But nonetheless, I still support the movement coz I think that by funding another skyscraper won't help in bringing Malaysia to another level. We are loosing more money than we actually are. What's the benefit that the rakyat is getting? I'm a tax payer that's why I want to know where my money has gone to?!



p/s: thanks Izwan, you have officially make me a politic-conscious, if ever that exist!

No comments: